Buting ,Williams & Stilling ,S.C. | A Criminal Defense Law Firm

Call Today for a FREE Consultation


How can we know how accurate DNA testing devices really are?

by | Aug 16, 2018 | Challenging DNA Evidence

The basic science behind DNA testing is sound enough. Each individual has DNA that varies as much as one person varies from another. With the right technology, we should be able to compare a DNA sample found at a crime scene with one taken from a suspect.

That is, we should be able to do a fair comparison of those samples as long as:

  • The evidence was gathered and preserved correctly
  • There was no break in the chain of evidence
  • The test used to compare the samples is scientifically valid
  • The test was performed correctly, and
  • The testimony about the test results is not exaggerated

We already know that a mistake at any point in DNA collection and testing could destroy the validity of the evidence. But do we even know that the specific test being used is valid and produces reliable evidence?

Forensic is only admissible in court if, among other considerations, its reliability is widely accepted by the relevant scientific community. This is because, in part, jurors aren’t in a position to weigh the validity of scientific evidence. More important, however, the Constitution guarantees criminal defendants the right to fully confront the evidence and witnesses against them. Defense attorneys can’t do that effectively unless they fully understand the meaning of any forensic evidence and how it was obtained.

Ordinarily, defense attorneys get at such information by questioning the witness introducing the evidence about how the test works, how it was performed and the degree of certainty involved. With some recent DNA tests, however, courts have been hesitant to allow the kind of deep scrutiny that would be required for a full understanding of the test.

Why? The tests involve trade secrets, and many courts have put the protection of those trade secrets ahead of the constitutional right to confront evidence.

Basically, courts have allowed these companies to say, “trust us; these tests are scientifically valid and produce reliable evidence.” Defense attorneys have been denied access to the devices’ underlying data that supports their proper operation and accuracy.

There may be a break in this trend, however. A California trial judge ruled last October that the defense has the right to see inside one DNA test called STRmix. The judge ordered the state to turn over the program’s source code, user manual, internal validation studies and other information over the objections of the company. The state has appealed the order and the ACLU and other public-interest groups have filed friend of the court briefs in support of the ruling.

This issue is being considered across the U.S., and all eyes will be on California’s court of appeal.

Trade secrets have long been involved in much civil litigation. The company’s interests are often accommodated by protective orders — specific orders from the court that limit or prohibit revealing the information beyond the parties involved in the litigation. The issue of trade secrets is only recently becoming a concern in criminal cases, where it clashes with a defendant’s constitutional rights. Reasonable protective orders in criminal cases can be fashioned to satisfy a company’s concerns. But in no event should trade secrets ever trump a defendant’s constitutional rights. 

Practice Areas

“I just want to say thank you for the outstanding work you have done for him and let you know how much we appreciate the time and attention you gave to his case. We are obviously overjoyed by today’s dismissal!” (Child pornography case dismissed after motion to suppress was granted)”

“After having had time to exhale, we thank each one of you and all the others who contributed to the exemplary Supreme Court presentation. We are proud of your efforts on our behalf and, equally important, on behalf of the many present and future defendants statewide.” (Client’s comment after Supreme Court oral argument)

“Thank you. Thank you. I am so pleased to hear that we won. It doesn’t seem that it was even a close call. I appreciate your efforts.” (Oconto County defendant after Buting, Williams & Stilling got his prison sentence overturned in the court of appeals) ”

“Your time and advice was appreciated more than words can express at a time when we really needed someone to guide us.” (Client)

“The outcome was amazing, one unavailable even under identical circumstances in probably 98 percent of federal courtrooms around the country. Separate and apart from the outcome, though, I am supremely impressed by your efforts on your client’s behalf. Your comments in support of the requested sentence were perfect in tone and, having now reviewed the extensive sentencing memorandum you filed, your work in that regard was exemplary as well. Your client was certainly fortunate to have you as his attorney.” (Local federal court attorney present at a sentencing)

“I can’t thank you enough, not only for all of the tireless work that you and your staff put into my case, but for telling me what I needed to hear, at a time when I absolutely had to hear it. I consider myself blessed for everything turning out the way it did, especially since I blindly picked you out of a phone book! You helped me, my family and friends in many more ways than the money ever could.” (Child pornography client)

“I think you will find that in any circles where Kathy’s name is raised, people will always respond positively and identify her as an extremely hardworking, knowledgeable and ethical lawyer who is timely and effective with any endeavor she takes on. These circles would include colleagues, friends, prosecutors, judges, professors and others who have crossed paths with Kathy. They would also include the many lawyers like me who have referred numerous cases to Kathy, invariably with positive feedback from the clients regarding her knowledge of their case, empathy, professionalism and fair-mindedness in addressing their concerns.” (Fellow attorney)

“Thank you for giving [our son] back to us. Wonderful work!” (Family of client accused of armed robbery after charges were dismissed)

“Yes, His perfect time and perfect place, you were a part of this plan. I almost didn’t hire you, but I took a step of faith trusting Him and look what happened? Praise God. Our Lord put you in your vocation for a reason, continue to help those He brings your way. May He bless you in ALL you do!” (Client who was wrongfully convicted of sexual assault in a northwestern Wisconsin county. He was released from prison after attorneys got his conviction reversed.)

“I really cannot thank you enough for your past help. You really know your stuff. It is actually funny when I think about my other past attorney’s knowledge and then when I talk with you. It’s like night and day. You’re like a walking book of knowledge with a purpose-driven life. Thanks.” (Brown County client of attorney Buting)

“A year later and I still believe your defense is the single best example of lawyering I have ever seen.” (Television reporter commenting on attorney Buting’s defense of Steven Avery)

“You have a certain brilliance that makes me sure that when you talk, it is good information and I am in good hands. You tell it to me like it is even when the things you say are not always the things that I would like to hear. You keep it REAL!!!” (Brown County client)

“Thank you, thank you, thank you! I feel like this was one of the biggest blessings that happened in my life. I put this along with my children being born healthy and when I survived that horrific shooting. I appreciate everything you have done for me. I couldn’t ask for better lawyers. I want to say thank you to everybody at your firm. I owe you more than the fee you so rightfully deserve. … You gave me back hope. Thank you, man! Out of my 36 years … I have never seen such kindness before. I don’t know what I did to deserve this; I’m very thankful nonetheless. Thank you for giving me hope again. Thank you for your generosity. There are still some really good people around.” (Federal criminal appeal client)

“There is no other attorney I’ve ever even heard of I’d rather have as chief counsel and leader of my defense/appeals than Jerome Buting. You’re the best. Period.” (Dane County client)

“Your advice and counsel were greatly appreciated. We appreciate you taking the time on your Sunday and evenings to help us. We are SO happy about the results! Thanks again.” (Waukesha County client)

“Thank you again … for everything. Five and one-half years of commitment, so many ups and downs and an outcome like that. You did a GREAT job.” (Waukesha County felony drug offense client)